Sexual harassment is pervasive in US physics programmes –


Survey of undergraduate women finds that most experienced some type of unwanted sexual attention during their physics studies.

Search for this author in:

The CCUWiP gathers physics students and professionals from across the country, shown here at McMaster University in 2017

A survey of women pursuing undergraduate degrees in physics has found that nearly three-quarters report experiencing at least one type of sexual harassment during their science studies.

The research1, conducted in 2017 at a series of US conferences for undergraduate students, was published on 22 April in Physical Review Physics Education Research. It is one of the first reports to document the pervasiveness of sexual harassment in physics.

“A lot of times people study how women can change to better fit in a field or be more successful,” says physicist Lauren Aycock, the study’s lead author and a science and technology policy fellow at the Department of Energy in Washington DC. “Perhaps physics needs to think about changing itself.”

Aycock and her colleagues recruited students who identified as female and were attending one of the Conferences for Undergraduate Women in Physics, a series of meetings held at various universities. The scientists asked participants to answer a questionnaire about sexual experiences that has been used for many rigorous studies including measuring harassment in the US military2.

Of the 455 people who responded, 338 reported experiencing some form of sexual harassment including gender harassment — such as being ignored because of their sex or gender, or being told inappropriate jokes — unwanted sexual attention, or a combination during the previous two years. The incidents took place in settings associated with physics, such as in a research lab, classroom or university department, or at a work-related event.

Researchers correlated experiencing harassment with a sense of not belonging to the broader physics community, and of succeeding because of external factors such as luck rather than innate ability.

A wake-up call

These findings “should be a wake-up call for all physicists who believe that participation in science should be meritorious”, the study authors write. “If we want to produce the great advancements and impactful work, we need to decide together to create an environment that makes it possible for all capable physicists to join and remain in the field.”

The survey results mesh with those from a major 2018 report3 from the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, which concluded that sexual harassment in academic science was pervasive, severe and harmed the careers of women.

Aycock notes that much of the attention on sexual harassment in the physical sciences has come from subfields such as astronomy. She hopes that the larger community of physicists will use this latest report as an opportunity to talk about and fight harassment. “It’s really important for physicists to start talking about this — to understand what sexual harassment is, to recognize it and to speak up about it,” she says.

The latest study did not explore differences involving women of colour or people with non-binary sexual identities. A 2016 report4 from the American Physical Society found that many people from sexual and gender minorities, especially those who are transgender or gender-nonconforming, routinely encountered hostile work environments. And a 2017 study5 among astronomers and planetary scientists found that women of colour face greater risk of gendered and racial harassment.


  1. 1.

    Aycock, L. M. et al. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 010121 (2019).

  2. 2.

    Fitzgerald, L. F., Magley, V. J., Drasgow, F. & Waldo, C. R. Mil. Psychol. 11, 243-263 (1999).

  3. 3.

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. National Academies Press (2018).

  4. 4.

    Atherton, T. J. et al. LBGT Climate in Physics: Building an Inclusive Community. American Physical Society (2016).

  5. 5.

    Clancy, K. B. H., Lee, K. M. N., Rodgers, E. M., & Richey, C. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 122, 1610-1623 (2017).

Download references

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the daily Nature Briefing email newsletter

Stay up to date with what matters in science and why, handpicked from Nature and other publications worldwide.

Sign Up

Powered by WPeMatico